| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sure, it makes sense that the character be reinterpreted for modern times, [url=http://www.staimanmedia.com/ray-ban.php]Fake Ray Bans UK[/url] and that the Deathlok of the 1970s might not have been a good fit in the 1990s, but it just felt like the character had [url=http://www.masercisa.es/es.asp]Gafas Oakley[/url] been robbed of his soul: that his vital essence the thing that made Deathlok [url=http://www.fal.es/fal.php]Gafas de Sol Oakley[/url] Deathlok was gone. Its 2010 now and we dont really know if Deathlok is any more relevant now or not (thats for readers and their wallets to decide) but we do know that hes cool as hell and we want to see him again, relevance be damned.
I mean, who doesnt like the idea of a cyborg with a face that looks like a rotting corpse arguing [url=http://www.staimanmedia.com/ray-ban.php]Replica Ray Bans[/url] with himself? He looks like the cover of Iron Maidens Somewhere in Time album! Were getting a new Mad Max movie and [url=http://www.iberacero.es/iberacero.asp]Gafas Oakley[/url] tinseltown has long been trying to revive both Escape from New York and Robocop. Why not bring back the one common denominator that was the obvious inspiration for all of these things ?
Weapon X As we mentioned earlier, Jason Aaron brought an army of Deathloks back from the future to torment
相关的主题文章：
[url=http://cwc.hlbrc.cn/Review.asp?NewsID=845]http://cwc.hlbrc.cn/Review.asp?NewsID=845[/url]
[url=http://myurlmark.com/node/4#comment-1482166]http://myurlmark.com/node/4#comment-1482166[/url]
[url=http://www.amarilfranklin.com.br/index.php?option=com_blog&view=blog]http://www.amarilfranklin.com.br/index.php?option=com_blog&view=blog[/url] |
|
