www.luntacunt.fora.pl

cheapbag214s

Censor When We Read Online,[url=http://giuseppezanottisneakerssale.olimx.com/][b]giuseppe zanotti sneakers sale[/b][/url]
Getting information off the Internet is like going for a drink from the fire hydrant. infobesity, could possibly be the source of more productivity lost than gained. Any regular, honest Internet user can verify this. Check Gmail, update LinkedIn, troll Reddit, upload to Flickr, pin to Pinterest, browse the HuffPost -- I possibly could go on and on but this clip sums it up nicely.
Media theorist Marshall McLuhan predicted the suffocating effects of information overload back in the 1960s. He argued that far from media being just a passive channel of information, the medium that we employ to interact using the media -- in this case the Internet -- actively determines how exactly we connect to this content.
In short, the Internet not just changes what media we have seen, but how we have seen it. The "how" being short blocks of conversational text injected with hyperlinks,[url=http://peutereyoutletitaliaonline.olimx.com/][b]Peuterey Italia[/b][/url], blinking adds, infographics, pop-ups, videos, and sound bites. Not only is the quantity of content available on the web mentally stifling -- approximately 14.18 billion pages by January 3 -- however the process by which we're relentlessly bombarded with this stifling content is over-stimulating in itself.
To prevent being at a loss for informational anxiety as a lot data prattles uncontrollably at us from our screens, we now have subconsciously become our own content editors and censorship committees, determining for ourselves which websites count frequenting and those aren't,[url=http://woolrichoutletdeutschland.halod.com/][b]http://woolrichoutletdeutschland.halod.com/[/b][/url], what submissions are good and what content is bad.
These forms of self-censorship are, perhaps justifiably, a defence mechanism, a barrier between our brains and also the vast recesses of cyberspace. When the argument does a good job of convincing us, we often accept is as true. If not, we tend to reject it. Presidential election was ripe with such unfounded allegations, many of which still stick thanks to our intuitive disdain for factual scrutiny.
But how does a disagreement do a sufficient job of convincing us to begin with? What's more, why does the persuasiveness of the argument cash more related to our preconceived notions than it does with some lofty idea of truthfulness?
Well to begin with, every person's cognitive reasoning is plagued by something psychologists make reference to as the confirmation bias. Meaning that we only trust a specialist, data, research, or opinion when the conclusions have been in line with our previously held beliefs. Hence, we often monopolize our time online skimming articles,[url=http://woolrichparkaschweiz.albirank.net/][b]Woolrich Parka Schweiz Online[/b][/url], blogs, and websites that reconfirm our own ideals. Accepting complacent arguments with little if any scrutiny because we want to believe them.
In doing so, we censor ourselves from a whole breadth of stimulating and informative content online since it may not tell us exactly what it is you want to hear. Opting instead to possess our opinions regurgitated to us by like-minded individuals in safe spaces of media that reify the validity of our personal ideologies.
Have a hypothetical labour activist and an investment banker. And the longer both sides won't cogitate opposing sources, the more confident they become in their one-sided world-views.
Eventually these one-sided world-views of this activist or banker may become so interwoven into the underpinnings that belongs to them self-image, they reach a point where they are afraid to scrutinize their very own beliefs because that would mean questioning the core foundations that they've based their lives upon. Once it has taken hold, this transformation from opinion to dogma is hard to reverse.
So how will we circumvent the cognitive laziness and also the confirmation biases that hinder our experiences online to be able to better challenge our accepted beliefs this year?
We have to find out more self-aware. This starts by familiarizing yourself with your personal biases and seeking evidence to the contrary of each and every opinion -- particularly those which you have appropriated on your own. A well-formulated help guide to your quest online such as the one created by Lifehacker should help to get you started,[url=http://woolrichparkaschweiz.albirank.net/][b]cheap woolrich winter coats woolen mills[/b][/url].
Moreover, it is important to remember that all of us have exactly the same issues with the confirmation bias and cognitive laziness while you do. This means that if you consider someone else's opinions, you have to simultaneously consider their biases. At the risk of sounding cliché, you have to make sure to place yourself in the advice-givers' shoes, knowing that a person's history, personality, and experiences weigh heavily on whatever information they're imparting upon you.
In the end, as many of us have observed top notch,[url=http://duveticaitaliaoutlet.webmium.com/][b]http://duveticaitaliaoutlet.webmium.com/[/b][/url], the web can be a great tool of knowledge, allowing a curious citizen, researcher,[url=http://duveticapiumini.olimx.com/][b]http://duveticapiumini.olimx.com/[/b][/url], student, journalist, or this Huffington Post blogger to find out in hours in the comfort of their own home, what accustomed to take days buried in paperwork down at the city archives or university library.
Yet with great access to information comes great cognitive responsibility. Which is as much as us as our very own personal editors, to battle self-censorship in all its forms by always pushing ourselves to seek out evidence to the contrary of what we should believe. You will find enough people out there attempting to censor online activity already, let's do not make their jobs any easier.
Click the link to leave a comment.
HuffPost High School welcomes a lively, thoughtful debate in the comment section. Hence the tendency to engage in cognitive laziness is much greater as infobesity overwhelms the readers' senses. global warming? By deciding to skim the material instead of really engaging by using it since you differ with what it's saying,[url=http://parajumperssalenorge.albirank.net/][b]Parajumpers Long Bear Online Norge Butikk[/b][/url], you're just further proving the reality that I am attempting to make.
You're probably right about info overload and so on--everybody says it--but I'm still struggling to determine how the Internet is really different from picking up the NY Times, flipping the pages, skimming the headlines,[url=http://billigmonclerjackenkaufen.olimx.com/][b]Billig Moncler Jacken Günstig Kaufen[/b][/url], reading a paragraph or two of this short article or that column,[url=http://discountnikesoccershoes.webmium.com/][b]Discount Nike Soccer Shoes[/b][/url], in support of reading thoroughly the parts that strike one as potentially interesting. It seems eerily much like what I do online. I additionally wonder whether it isn't a little odd to call this kind of selection process "censorship". If I browse the hockey news and never the cricket news, is that the same task as censoring the cricket news? Just wondering.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://www.loltestab.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/men-s-woollens-for-winter-spun5,12011.html#12067]http://www.loltestab.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/men-s-woollens-for-winter-spun5,12011.html#12067[/url]

[url=http://god.gold168.cn/thread-1308091-1-1.html]http://god.gold168.cn/thread-1308091-1-1.html[/url]

[url=http://www.explorehmong.com/index.php?do=/user/pending/]http://www.explorehmong.com/index.php?do=/user/pending/[/url]

[url=http://www.ariceptjga.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/shoes-on-an-overhead-wire,19533.html#19655]http://www.ariceptjga.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/shoes-on-an-overhead-wire,19533.html#19655[/url]

[url=http://www.tidesoffortune.fora.pl/dyplomacja,8/buy-inexpensive-jordan-1-pluz-size-on-spun1,15154.html#15220]http://www.tidesoffortune.fora.pl/dyplomacja,8/buy-inexpensive-jordan-1-pluz-size-on-spun1,15154.html#15220[/url]

[url=http://www.orderphenterminecheap.fora.pl/buy-cheap-phenterminme-online-phentermine-prescription,1/buy-cheap-jordan-6-carmine-online-spun4,12764.html#12784]http://www.orderphenterminecheap.fora.pl/buy-cheap-phenterminme-online-phentermine-prescription,1/buy-cheap-jordan-6-carmine-online-spun4,12764.html#12784[/url]

[url=http://drupal.martinagardinerphotography.com/node/1#comment-14530875]http://drupal.martinagardinerphotography.com/node/1#comment-14530875[/url]

[url=http://www.compassionforgreyhounds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=23834#23834]http://www.compassionforgreyhounds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=23834#23834[/url]

[url=http://www.rakenbymd.fora.pl/coke-from-waits-poker-onnie-mentioned-fantasy-casino-shoots-you-held-his-anything,1/danskin-now-toning-shoes,13954.html#13970]http://www.rakenbymd.fora.pl/coke-from-waits-poker-onnie-mentioned-fantasy-casino-shoots-you-held-his-anything,1/danskin-now-toning-shoes,13954.html#13970[/url]

[url=http://eta-pi.com/comment/reply/2]http://eta-pi.com/comment/reply/2[/url]

[url=http://www.compazinegtccv.fora.pl/what-say-watery-smile-work-during-quiet-breath-ambien-strengths-loove-you-iscouraged,1/ryan-aim-to-make-games-history,15866.html#15912]http://www.compazinegtccv.fora.pl/what-say-watery-smile-work-during-quiet-breath-ambien-strengths-loove-you-iscouraged,1/ryan-aim-to-make-games-history,15866.html#15912[/url]

[url=http://bbs.xueliedu.com/read.php?tid=41141]http://bbs.xueliedu.com/read.php?tid=41141[/url]

[url=http://221.226.62.36:8888/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=8002548]http://221.226.62.36:8888/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=8002548[/url]

[url=http://www.darknessevolution.fora.pl/registration,13/importance-of-sandwich-maker-in-your-kitchen-spun5,71788.html#80324]http://www.darknessevolution.fora.pl/registration,13/importance-of-sandwich-maker-in-your-kitchen-spun5,71788.html#80324[/url]

[url=http://www.experienceproject.com/]http://www.experienceproject.com/[/url]