| cheapbag214s |
|
|
| |
| Joined: 27 Jun 2013 |
| Posts: 20570 |
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
|
| Location: England |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Quinn Lays an Egg with Weekend Filings in Apple,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
When trying to persuade a magistrate not to sanction your side,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], probably best not to annoy him.
That the lesson for the Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Sullivan team representing Samsung in the tablet and iPhone war with Apple. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal said at the discovery hearing. When Quinn lawyers explained they filed as soon as they could and called the papers "icing on the cake,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," Grewal was nonplussed. "Our local rules don permit for on the cake submitted Friday before a hearing,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," he told the lawyers,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], led by Victoria Maroulis.
Grewal isn known for growling at lawyers. "Maybe it a Midwestern thing,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," he once said for himself in response to attorneys describing his courteous demeanor. But this didn sit well with him.
"Samsung filed this administrative request on Saturday,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], April 7,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], 2012,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," he wrote in an order Tuesday night,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "less than two days before the Monday morning hearing set for the underlying motion and on a weekend when many of the Jewish and Christian faiths celebrate the Passover and Easter holidays. Samsung filed its request without explanation for its delay,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], citing only Apple¹s and distortions of certain Samsung witness deposition testimony and Apple¹s unfounded accusations against Samsung,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], made in its reply brief,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," the order said,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], before rejecting the weekend filings.
The rejected papers claimed that Apple had made the "serious -- and baseless -- accusation that Samsung is somehow manipulating its financial data to obscure its profits,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], notwithstanding case law holding that the profits of a non-party foreign subsidiary are not recoverable and therefore irrelevant,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]," Maroulis had written. "Unless the Court grants Samsung leave to file its supplemental response,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Samsung will not have the opportunity to brief the Court on the issues raised for the first time in Apple order on the sanctions motion is forthcoming.
相关的主题文章：
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] |
|
