www.luntacunt.fora.pl
Luntacunt project
www.luntacunt.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Announcements
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Select a forum
Team
----------------
Rules
Announcements
Assignments
Forge
Legal / publishing
Tips & Tricks
Pub
Design
----------------
Genre
Technologie
Implementacja
----------------
Schedule
Snapshots
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Sat 16:47, 03 Aug 2013
Post subject: claim we're hard-wired for things
claim we're hard-wired for things, but when you peel through the layers of the experiments, the details matter and suddenly the evidence doesn't seem so compelling...When people say there's an innate constraint,
michael kors outlet online
, they're making suppositions about what came before the behavior in question. Instead of acknowledging that at 12 months a lot of development has already happened and we don't exactly know what came before this particular behavior, researchers take the easy way out and conclude that there must be inborn constraints. That's the predicament scientists have gotten themselves into.Imprinting is one of many examples reviewed by the Iowa researchers. In 1935, Viennese zoologist Konrad Lorenz famously discovered that newborn chicks whose eggs were incubated in isolation will still correctly pick the call of their mother over another animal. It seemed the perfect little proof of innate ability. But in 1997,
jimmy choo sale
, Gilbert Gottlieb discovered the flaw in that assumption. It turned out that when fetal chicks were deprived
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Theme created by
Vjacheslav Trushkin
Regulamin