www.luntacunt.fora.pl
Luntacunt project
www.luntacunt.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Snapshots
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Select a forum
Team
----------------
Rules
Announcements
Assignments
Forge
Legal / publishing
Tips & Tricks
Pub
Design
----------------
Genre
Technologie
Implementacja
----------------
Schedule
Snapshots
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Tue 22:04, 19 Nov 2013
Post subject: going as far back as 1926
Researchers turn to computers to help keep up with state of science
RALEIGH, N.C., April 18 () -- Researchers at North Carolina State University say they've developed a computer program to help them keep up with current literature in their field.With hundreds to thousands of scientific papers published each day, keeping up with the state of the art in any area of science is a daunting task, they said.The researchers said they developed a text-mining algorithm to prioritize research papers to read and include in their public database of scientific literature describing how environmental chemicals interact with genes to affect human health."Over 33,[url=http://www.kbcrussia.com/]true religion outlet[/url],000 scientific papers have been published on heavy metal toxicity alone, going as far back as 1926,[url=http://www.dtvtk3.com/]jimmy choo outlet[/url]," Allan Peter Davis, a project manager for the university's Comparative Toxicogenomics Database said. "We simply can't read and code them all. And, with the help of this new algorithm, we don't have to."The sophisticated algorithm evaluates the text from thousands of papers and assigns a relevancy score to each document, a university release said Thursday."The score ranks the set of articles to help separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak," research bioinformatician Thomas Wiegers said.The researchers text-mined 15,000 articles and compared a representative sample to database entries that had been manually read and evaluated."The results were impressive," Davis said, noting the manual readers concurred with the algorithm 85 percent of the time with respect to the highest-scored papers."It's a tremendous time-saving step," Davis said. "With this we can allocate our resources much more effectively by having the team focus on the most informative papers."
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Theme created by
Vjacheslav Trushkin
Regulamin