www.luntacunt.fora.pl
Luntacunt project
www.luntacunt.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Schedule
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Select a forum
Team
----------------
Rules
Announcements
Assignments
Forge
Legal / publishing
Tips & Tricks
Pub
Design
----------------
Genre
Technologie
Implementacja
----------------
Schedule
Snapshots
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Thu 0:08, 07 Nov 2013
Post subject: which is based in Connecticut
Court revisits False Claims case and puts a number to damages ,[url=http://www.isabelmarantsneakersbootss.com/]isabel marant online[/url]
CLEVELAND,[url=http://www.isabelmarantsneakersbootss.com/]isabel marant sneakers[/url], June 20 () -- A federal court in Ohio said Thursday United Technologies Corp. was liable for $473 million in damages in a case concerning billing for jet engines.The case has gone up and down the hierarchy of the court system, starting with a 2008 ruling that the jet engine maker had violated the False Claims Act, but did not meet the criteria for damages under common law. No monetary penalties were assessed in that ruling and both the U.S. Justice Department and the company, which is based in Connecticut, filed appeals.A federal appeals court in Cleveland later ruled that the company was in violation of the False Claims Act and that the lower court should revisit the issue of whether or not damages should be paid under common law.Under Thursday's penalties of $364 million were assessed for violations of the False Claims Act and $109 million added to that on common law claims.The case began with charges that the defense contractor submitted price proposals for F-15 and F-16 fighter jet engines that purposefully used outdated data that would result in smaller totals than would be submitted when the bills came due."UTC's proposed prices for the engine contract misrepresented how UTC calculated those prices, resulting in the government paying hundreds of millions more than it otherwise would have paid for the engines," the Justice Department said in a statement.The case covers the company's behavior between 1985 and 1990, the department said.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Theme created by
Vjacheslav Trushkin
Regulamin