www.luntacunt.fora.pl
Luntacunt project
www.luntacunt.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Snapshots
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Select a forum
Team
----------------
Rules
Announcements
Assignments
Forge
Legal / publishing
Tips & Tricks
Pub
Design
----------------
Genre
Technologie
Implementacja
----------------
Schedule
Snapshots
Topic review
Author
Message
ekmcflye5t
Posted: Sat 19:32, 26 Oct 2013
Post subject: barbour The confidential
**NOTE** - has claimed original rights on the article "Sarbanes Oxley in Europe: The EU Data Protection Directive vs. Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection" ... if there is a dispute on the originality of this article ... please contact us via our and supply our staff with the appropriate details of dispute (ie ).
Keywords: , , ,
George Lekatis is a [url=http://www.casa-polis.com/barbour-paris.html]barbour[/url] senior risk and compliance consultant and trainer.www.compliance-llc.com
References:
About the Author:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted as a reaction to corporate scandals, has a significant impact on European companies. The reason is simple: Hundreds of European-headquartered companies are dually listed on two stock exchanges, one in Europe and the other in the United States. 470 non-US [url=http://t.zzfamily.com/?p=182#comment-181365]How to Increase Your Copywriting Success - written by Chris Marlow[/url] companies are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with a combined market capitalization of $3.8 trillion, 30 per cent of the total value of [url=http://www.fibmilano.it]woolrich[/url] capitalization of [url=http://www.giuseppezanottipaschere.com]giuseppe zanotti soldes[/url] companies quoted on the exchange.
EU Data Protection Directive
What is personal [url=http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~tk1054/yybbs/yybbs.cgi]jimmy choo in a matter of da[/url] data (according to EU)? Personal data can be any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (directly or indirectly): Name, telephone number, photos. Data specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity. What is processing of personal data? Any operation performed upon personal data whether or not by automatic means
Data Controllers must adhere to the following rules: Data must be relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose for which they are processed. Data must be accurate.
Data controllers are required to provide reasonable measures for data subjects to rectify erase or block incorrect data about them. The directive prohibits transfer of personal information to countries outside the EU, which lack adequate protection of privacy.
Sarbanes Oxley
Section 301. [url=http://www.mxitcms.com/abercrombie/]abercrombie milano[/url] Public company audit committees: Each audit committee shall establish procedures for:
(A) The receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the issuer regarding accounting, internal [url=http://www.teatrodeoro.com/hollisterde.php]hollister online shop[/url] accounting controls, or auditing matters; and
(B) The confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the issuer of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters
The [url=http://www.jeremyparendt.com/jimmy-choo.php]jimmy choo[/url] challenge
How a US company with offices throughout the EU can comply with the notice and choice principles of EU [url=http://www.agentparadise.com]woolrich sito ufficiale[/url] Data Protection laws while simultaneously complying with the whistle blower requirements under Sarbanes Oxley?
How can we have both:
1. A Sarbanes Oxley hotline reporting service for employees to use anonymously, and
2. A Data Protection control: Data subjects must learn, rectify, erase or block incorrect data about them.
The problems
On 14 June 2005 the French Data Protection Authority refused to authorize the use of anonymous whistleblower hotlines. The French Authority's view was that such hotlines are "disproportionate to the objectives sought and the risks of slanderous denunciations and the stigmatization of employees who were the subjects of an ethics alert."
In a similar decision a German labor court ruled that parts of an employee code of conduct inviting [url=http://www.thehygienerevolution.com/hollister.php]hollister[/url] employees to report misconduct to a whistleblowers hotline breached German labor law.
Early indications from the UK Information Commissioners Office (ICO) are that they would decline to follow the French and German approach. In contrast to the French and German decisions, the ICO's view is that the appropriate use of such helpline by organizations would not, in principle, raise data protection [url=http://www.ktbruce.co.uk/mulberrysale.php]mulberry sale[/url] concerns.
However, where organizations misuse such anonymous hotlines for inappropriate information gathering purposes there may be data protection implications.
Recommendations
Companies that are publicly traded in the United States and also have operations in the European Union must be very careful with the [url=http://www.ktbruce.co.uk/barbourjackets.php]barbour[/url] whistleblower provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
First of all, before implementing Sarbanes Oxley hotline reporting services, companies need to ask for permission from the local Data Protection Authority.
Complaints must be processed inside the European Union. Companies need to establish local investigation procedures. The suspected person would be given the [url=http://www.sandvikfw.net/shopuk.php]hollister outlet[/url] opportunity to comment within two days. In the event that the investigation shows that the allegations were unfounded, the data must be deleted within two days of the case closure. If the allegations are determined to be well-founded, then the file would be kept for one to five years after the case was [url=http://www.gmsvelo.com/?p=351#comment-50005]Solution To Buy Second Hand Mobiles Cheaply - written by Bobbie Barber[/url] closed (depending on management level).
Can EU really protect employees from the whistleblower provisions?
No. If a U.S. public company lists on its website or intranet site that it has a telephone number or email address where anonymous complaints can be received, even if that site is not addressed to or publicized in EU, an employee in Europe may still go to the site and file an anonymous complaint.
George Lekatis, general manager of Compliance LLC (www.compliance-llc.com) is a senior risk and compliance consultant and trainer.
(c)
Article Source: uPublish.info
Category:
George Lekatis Article Feed :
Sarbanes Oxley in [url=http://www.davidhabchy.com]barbour factory shop[/url] Europe: The EU Data Protection Directive vs. Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower ProtectionArticle Summary: How a US company with offices throughout the EU can comply with the notice and choice principles of EU Data Protection laws while simultaneously complying with the whistle blower requirements under Sarbanes Oxley?
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001-2003 phpBB Group
Theme created by
Vjacheslav Trushkin
Regulamin